|
|
| Question
Details |
Following are the details of the question you selected.
You may submit a response to this
question or post a new question.
|
| Question No.: |
5196 |
Category : |
Refining Operations |
| Date Posted: |
3/8/2010 |
|
|
|
| Subject: FCC Conversion Calculation |
| |
| Question: |
What is the correct and standard method of reporting FCC conversion?
1. 100 - (LCO vol% + DCO vol%) several literature use this method to report FCC volumetric conversion. Here LCO and DCO volume yields are calculated as volumetric flow of LCO/DCO divided by volumetric flow of Feed, and not the total volume of the products. Where as, the sum of the volume yields is normally greater than 100%, why 100 - (LCO vol% + DCO vol%) is used to determine the conversion?
2. 100-(LCO wt% + DCO wt%) in some literatures this is used to report FCC conversion in terms of mass percent. To me, this method looks reasonable.
3. Ideally we call FCC conversion as 430 deg F conversion. Meaning the volume % of products boiling below 430 deg F. Still I have noticed in some literature that coke is also considered into it.
Please suggest me the best and most practiced method across the global refining industry.
|
Submitted by :
Name:
Company Name:
Location:
EMail: |
Jaydip Bhadaliya
Bahrain Petroleum Co.
, Bahrain
jaydip.bhadaliya@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Number of responses
: 3 |
|
Response 5196-1
Date : 3/13/2010
Your questions on conversion are intuitive. Most do not think or understand there is a dilemma. There are actually 2 conversion definitions; apparent and actual. But first you need to understand that conversion is a relative term to measure reaction system performance.
LCO and DCO have traditionally been the lowest value FCC products. The kinetic dynamics of FCC have been to produce gasoline and LPG. That is not necessarily true today but it is the historical reference. As such, all liquid products that are not gasoline and LPG are lumped together as "unconverted" for the sake of having a relative indication of performance. There is nothing magical about the number; it just is the generally accepted number indicating value which may or may not apply to your particular operation or processing goal or profit margin.
Apparent conversion is the one you mention. It is simply the proportion of the total liquid yield that is not LCO or DCO. It does not consider coke or gas yield, since one of the primary advantages of FCC is producing more liquid products than feed. This is a good relative indication of day-to-day performance but not necessarily to profitability or margin. The way we balance this issue is to also look at selectivity; how much gasoline or LPG as a ratio to liquid conversion or ratio of LCO/DCO.
Actual conversion is defined as the disappearance of 650F from the feed, which is the traditional endpoint of LCO. The difference is obviously one is adjusted for distillation and one is not. This actual conversion has much fallen out of favor in the industry and rarely even referred to anymore. It suffers from the same issues in defining performance. It just represents gasoline and lighter and does not take coke or gas yield into account. I am not aware of any ratios or indicators that relate coke or dry gas to liquid conversion. Normally, there is no issue in this regard, although it is possible to have high apparent or actual liquid conversion with no selectivity. I personally have operated an FCC at 96% conversion, but the products were 25 wt% coke, 71 wt% gas, and 4 wt% slurry. (It is a long story).
This said, either value is still relevant. What you need to consider is adjusting your value or targeting another value to reflect what is important to your operation and margin and what you are trying to accomplish. For example, if you are interested in LCO yield, then you need to look at LCO/DCO vol. ratio as well as LCO as a percent of feed. Remember these are relative values to indicate better or worse performance. They are not absolute and require the kind of thought process you are going through to understand what these values actually represent.
|
| Name - Steven A Kalota |
| CompanyName - Expertech FCC Consulting |
| Location - Irvine, California, USA |
| Email - skalota@pacbell.net |
|
|
Response 5196-2
Date : 3/15/2010
Well, it depends. Do you sell your products by volume or weight? Most refiners sell by volume and it is easy to measure volume, particularly 50 - 60 years ago during the early days of FCC. Many of the conventions used in refining were established long ago before computers and sophisticated instruments and analyzers. Which ever method you use just be consistent and be sure all know whether it's vol or wt.
Conversion is measuring the disappearance of feed, not the creation of products. So 100 is used. Yes there is a volume increase in the FCC, which is good because products are usually sold by volume. As for what EP to use for conversion, that depends on whether you are running for maximum gasoline, or max distillates (gasoline plus LCO for diesel). Again, just be consistent and make sure everyone knows the basis of the calculation?
At my age I like to keep it simple, so I use volume.
|
| Name - D. A. Husted |
| CompanyName - Retired |
| Location - , USA |
| Email - dahusted@aol.com |
|
|
Response 5196-3
Date : 3/16/2010
During my earlier experience in FCC in a refinery in India we correct the Feed and products densities to 15deg-c and use to report yields calculated on weight basis for combined LCO+DCO.
|
| Name - Rajan V. Natarajan |
| CompanyName - Takreer |
| Location - Abu Dhabi, UAE |
| Email - rajan@takreer.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
