Refining Online
lineYellow.gif (837 bytes)


Questions & Answers

Blogs
ROL Blog
Q&A
Browse the Q&A
Knowledge Base
Services
• Online Training
• Refinery Tech Sup
• Refinery Prod Ctr
• ROL Webcast
Events
Events Calendar
Submit Event
ROL Assistant
About
Download
Member Directory
Search
About
Add
More Information
Advertising Info
Contact Us
Useful Links
Refining Online Q&A Post a question
Guidelines & Conditions
 
  Search the Q&A
 Keywords:
 Category:
 Question No.                                     
Browse all questions
Last 10 active questions:


Question No : 5487  Date Posted :2/2/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Vacuum Tower Tube Failure
  I'm searching for the procedures that should be used in a vacuum tower furnace tube failure. If we have a tube failure the vacuum tower pressure should be increased to atmosphere pressure? And generally what other items should be considered?
Number of responses: 0


Question No : 5486  Date Posted :1/28/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : FCC Feed preheat temperature
  What is the best way to increase feed preheat temperature by minimum disturbance to other parameters?
Number of responses: 1


Question No : 5485  Date Posted :1/27/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Deposition of fines in turboexpander FCC unit
  In one of our FCC units (Kellogg Orthoflow model), we are suffering severe problems of fouling (fines deposition) in the turbo expander. The scheme of the flue gas circuit is: two stage cyclones in the regenerator + Shell Third Stage Separator before turbo expander + 4th Stage Separator (cyclone) to recover flue gas from fines coming from TSS.

We have also observed high level of moisture in the fines from 4th Stage Separator (10-15%wt). So we suspect that the fouling of the expander is due a cold point in the flue gas circuit (where flue gas humidity is condensed) or an uncontrolled inlet of water / steam.

Has anyone experienced this kind of problems in an FCCU? What could be the potential causes of the severe fouling of the expander?

Number of responses: 1


Question No : 5484  Date Posted :1/22/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Minimum MAT activity in FCC unit
  My question is related with the minimum MAT activity that can be reached in a FCC unit. The main objective in one of our FCC units is maximum middles distillates, and we run this unit at very low severity. The MAT activity of the e-cat is 54-55%wt, with some punctual values of 52-53%wt.

We would like to decrease e-cat activity even further, but we have some concerns and doubts about potential problems that could arise, like definitive loss of cracking activity, significant increase in bottoms production, etc.

Has anyone experience running and FCC unit at MAT activity below 52-53%wt? What problems could appear with such low MAT activity?

Number of responses: 0


Question No : 5483  Date Posted :1/19/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Burner for low pressure gas
  Is it possible to burn gas directly from the atmospheric distillation after overhead condensor with 0.4 kg/cm square in a low pressure burner?
Number of responses: 3


Question No : 5482  Date Posted :1/18/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Ground flare
  I see a ground flare in a petrochemical complex. Why it is used instead of flare stack?
Number of responses: 2


Question No : 5481  Date Posted :1/17/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Cleaning Amine Systems
  We recently cleaned a plant with Amine Gasoleos hydrodesulferised Coke in the Madero refinery in Mexico, the results were excellent but the system had formed many sludge. I would like to know the negative effects if Amine systems are not cleaned.
Number of responses: 1


Question No : 5480  Date Posted :1/17/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Foaming problem in RDS amine absorber
  We had a foaming problem in our RDS unit last month, during the period of abnormal high level of absorber, we found a lot of particle plugged in lean amine supply pump filter (downstream of antifoam inject), and XRF analysis show high silicon content (>15 wt%), we wonder silicon-base antifoam cause agglomerate amine particle (iron sulfide, Carbon, etc), after an unplanned shutdown for cleaning amine absorber, we also found similar particle plugging absorber tray.

(1).has someone experienced the same problem in your amine absorber?
(2).What is the best practice to treat antifoam? Shall we change silicon free type antifoam?

Number of responses: 1


Question No : 5479  Date Posted :1/17/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Mercaptans in Fuel Oil
  Is there any standard method to find out the Mercaptans / H2S in fuel oil?
Number of responses: 0


Question No : 5478  Date Posted :1/15/2012 View detailsView details and responses  
Category : Refining Operations Submit a responseSubmit a response  
  Subject : Maximum feed preheat temperature in FCCU
  My question is related with the maximum temperature that can be reached in the feed preheated furnace in FCC unit. We operate one of our FCC units in maximum distillates mode and we want to decrease cat/oil to minimum. Currently, we have the following design limits in the feed preheated furnace: 360C (680 F) in the process size and 419C (786F) in the skin points of the furnace tubes. According to a study of our engineering department, temperature in the skin points could be increased until 467C (873F). But our main concern is that an increase in temperature in furnace tubes could cause coking of the feed. Although the feed to the unit is Mild Hydrocracker residue, that has low tendency to coking.

Has anyone experience running FCC units at feed preheat temperatures higher that 360C (680F) in process / 419C (786F) in skin point?

Number of responses: 0


 


Refining Online is a service of Astron International, Inc.
© 1999-2012 Copyright Astron International Inc., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer